Writing Samples
Sedona is Moving Closer to a
Transit Solution
http://www.redrockreview.com/august/story2a.html
Getting from point A to point B
in the easiest, fastest and
safest manner, is an age-old
problem. And now, with the
impact of mass population and
all it entails - including more
vehicles, more pollution, more
noise, and more traffic -
figuring out the best way to
cope with this change, while
preserving the integrity of land
and community, can be difficult.
This is what Sedona is currently
dealing with.
A breathtaking area that draws
millions of tourists a year into
its pockets of beauty and
canyons of grandeur, Sedona is
suffering from an overload. The
citizens, who must deal with
such impacts, day-in and
day-out, are asking, "How can we
relieve the city of her stress
and ours?" The result - a Sedona
Transit Study.
The focus on solving the transit
problem began in 1994. During
the 1994 Sedona Academy Forum,
entitled "Building Partnerships
with the Forest Service," the
issue of forest service impact
and the need for change became a
challenging question. From this,
the 1995 Sedona Forum
("Congestion or Conservation -
Do We Have Choices?") began to
explore transportation options
for the Sedona area. The Action
Coalition for Transportation
Solutions (ACTS) was formed with
Sedona architect Max Licher
leading the program.
ACTS would serve as a mediator
among all governmental entities
by providing ideas and study
objectives to be considered.
ACTS first task was to do a
feasibility study. This was done
by the Community Transportation
Association of America, a
nonprofit transportation
research and technical
assistance organization.
This study, based partially upon
a prior study done for the
Sedona Ranger Station, by
TransitPlus, and further
detailed information, helped
provide a preliminary guide on
the use of a transit system in
Sedona and the surrounding
areas. The study also helped
point out ways to ameliorate
growing traffic issues, while at
the same time expand a range of
transportation options.
"More than four years ago, the
Forest Service reenvisioned a
planning process, looking at
transportation issues," Licher
said. "They were the first to
hire an outside consultant and
they received a positive report.
"We wanted to take that to the
next step - look for grant
money, get a more in-depth
perspective and a report for the
community - not a full system
design, but a feasibility study
in concept. We wanted a public
and private team approach. We
didn't feel we could afford to
hire a transit planner, so we
decided to get the private
sector involved, and that might
help facilitate the process."
Because neither the Sedona
Forest Service, Yavapai or
Coconino County, nor the City of
Sedona could outright afford to
pay for a transit system, ACTS
wanted to look into finding a
private company to create and
manage the system. The group
opened themselves up to outside
proposals and two were received;
one from Coach USA and the other
from Parking Company of America.
Both gave ideas of incentives
and disincentives to consider:
What would assist Sedona with
its traffic issues? . . . and
how would the City plan to fund
the project.
Mike Rayber, Sedona's Associate
Long Range Planner, said that
currently both proposals are
under review by the consortium,
the City, ACTS and both
counties.
"The proposals may be revised
and asked to be resubmitted
based on additional input by
this group," he said. "One of
the two may be invited to pursue
the project once the agencies
define the next steps of the
process. But it is really
preliminary right now."
Each proposal has a different
focus on how to solve the
transportation issue in Sedona,
which includes long-discussed
from paid parking to detailed
shuttle service.
The governmental agencies
involved agree that there are
many considerations to be
reviewed within each proposal.
These include what kind of
market will be created that will
encourage transit use, how the
program will work financially,
what effects there will be on
land use, what kind of parking
policies will be needed and
enforced, and what are the
infrastructural needs.
"From the City's point of view,
this is a feasibility issue,"
Rayber said. "The whole vision
for the transit system is that
it is self-sustaining and
privately run. We want to be
assured it will work and there
won't be a major public subsidy
beyond the planning - perhaps
some infrastructure needs will
occur, but we need to know what
kind of policy decisions will
have to be made for the system
to work."
For the Forest Service, concerns
focus on how the program will
provide a quality experience
into the forest without
degradation of the lands along
roadways. "We want to provide a
good experience for visitors in
the best possible way," said Ken
Anderson of the Sedona Ranger
District.
"If we have to make more parking
lots and clear off more land,
this is going to take away from
the visitor's experience. But it
is dangerous as it is now, with
the off-road parking going on in
the (Oak Creek) Canyon."
The forest service is also
interested in maintaining the
environmental quality and
preserving the community's sense
of place to both residents and
visitors by reducing traffic
congestion and noise. Creating
more parking lots, with water
runoff from these lots into the
forest, isn't their ideal
solution.
For the citizens of Sedona,
preserving the small town
character by limiting road
expansion is a top
consideration. Bringing in more
roads that are wider or bigger
won't solve all the problems nor
will it preserve the integrity
of their town.
So how will these needs be met?
Solution ideas range from
creating a public shuttle system
with frequent, convenient and
accessible service within Sedona
and between the Village of Oak
Creek and Uptown Area, to
parking strategies. All ideas
serve as incentives and
disincentives toward using the
transit system. Without such
incentives and disincentives, it
is feared by proposers that the
program would not work. And with
surrounding communities such as
the Verde Valley watching Sedona
in hopes of following suit,
Sedona wants to do it right.
"I have been watching Sedona,
and we have had a staff member
from our engineering department
attend all of the meetings to
keep us up to speed," said
County Supervisor Chip Davis.
"We will eventually need some
sort of transit system within
the incorporated communities, so
we are quite anxious to see how
Sedona's program works when it
gets going."
Davis continued, "I know this
program is mostly citizen driven
and one of the neat things about
their approach is that they have
tried to minimize the impacts on
others by looking for grants or
a vendor to come in and operate
the program so that they can do
it without any other types of
government support. I have been
watching them go and struggle
and am very happy they are
hanging in there."
Armor Todd, owner of the Sedona
Trolley, would like to see a
solution that includes our
neighbors. "I think a transit
system is a good idea, but a
Sedona-only system is not going
to address the problem
adequately. I think it would be
better addressed on a regional
basis. Some think our traffic
problem is from the tourists
only. It is also the local
people causing the problem."